Many have been hearing about the recent turmoil with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the private equity firms responsible for funding about half the nation’s mortgages. Home owners, as well as loan-seekers want to know: “What does it mean for me?”
The following article explains well the situation, as well as the proposed solutions for these Idaho mortgage funding institutions. In short, they have enough money, it’s simply a matter of investor confidence that they will always continue to have enough money. The proposed government solutions help reassure investors that they will. “There has been no liquidity crisis for Fannie or Freddie … It’s simply been a crisis of confidence in the equity.”
The details of the problems and solutions will continue to unfold. Some experts think lending requirements could continue to tighten, until full market confidence returns. More than ever, we believe loan seekers should work with a local lender who will take the time to listen, and take advantage of borrower attributes that might be skimmed over by large lending firms.
- -
Written by Lisa Kratz and Mike Little
Apex Mortgage | Meridian, Idaho | (208) 888-9251 | myIdahoHomeLoan.com
– The federal government moved in to help bolster Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on Sunday with a Treasury Department proposal that sets the stage for a government-orchestrated rescue. In the short term, the plan enables the two quasi-governmental agencies to continue to borrow money at favorable rates in order to fund their operations.
Last week, concerns about the financial stability of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were at the forefront of investors’ minds, and shares of both companies tumbled.
Here, a look at some of the factors behind the rescue operation launched this weekend.
What is the government proposing?
The Treasury Department disclosed a three-part plan to enable both companies to continue to play “a central role” in the nation’s housing market in their “current form as shareholder-owned companies.”
The department’s plan would temporarily increase Fannie and Freddie’s line of credit with the Treasury; give the Treasury Department the ability to purchase stock in either of the two companies — if it becomes necessary; and give the Federal Reserve a say in setting financial requirements and standards for the companies.
The department said it arrived at the plan after consultations with the Federal Reserve, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight — the agency that regulates Fannie and Freddie — as well as the SEC, and Fannie and Freddie. Congress would have to approve any of the measures.
The Fed also said Sunday that the companies could borrow funds at a discounted rate — known as the “discount window” — from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York “should such lending prove necessary.”
So does all of this amount to a bailout?
Right now, it’s more of an effort to battle the markets’ lack of confidence. Opening the discount window to Fannie and Freddie “instills confidence in investors, so investors will continue to fund Fannie and Freddie,” says Frederick Cannon, chief equity strategist for Keefe, Bruyette & Woods. “I don’t see them using the window.”
Fannie and Freddie float bonds in the debt markets and use the money they raise to fund mortgages and guarantee mortgages. There has been no liquidity crisis for Fannie or Freddie, Cannon explains: “It’s simply been a crisis of confidence in the equity.” The actions over the weekend, he says, will enable the two companies to continue to support the mortgage market.
Why did the government choose to step in over the weekend?
The rescue effort was orchestrated to calm investors worldwide and to prevent the collapse of these two housing finance giants. Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee more than $5 trillion in mortgages — nearly half of all the mortgages issued in the United States.
The announcements on Sunday were intentionally made prior to the opening of the Asian stock markets and a Monday morning auction of $3 billion in securities by Freddie Mac.
Last week, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said no immediate bailout was necessary in an attempt to calm investors. The Treasury’s proposal on Sunday reflects a shift in gears to assure investors that the companies have all the money they might need, and that there’s no immediate danger of a collapse. It’s also a means for encouraging the continued purchase of Fannie and Freddie’s securities.
Both companies said on Sunday that they hold more than adequate capital. Freddie Mac also said it expected that its June 30 results will show that the firm has “a much greater surplus” above the minimum requirements.
What are the next steps?
The rescue provisions announced over the weekend will be added to a housing bill that is making its way through Congress. But Congress has to wrestle with a number of questions that regulators left unanswered. Fannie and Freddie are chartered by Congress, but they are public companies. What implications does this have for other private companies if the government bails out Fannie and Freddie? If the Treasury Department steps in and buys Fannie and Freddie stock, will those shares be of the same class as those held by institutional and indvidual investors, and will they be worth the same?
What are the implications of these proposals for taxpayers?
For years, advocates in Congress and in the private sector have been pushing for Fannie and Freddie to have a stronger, single regulator. Among those is FM Policy Focus, a group of financial services and housing organizations. Executive Director Mike House says the legislation in Congress now is “strong and adequate” for meeting this goal. The group also supports the Treasury’s proposals, which it says “will prevent taxpayers from having to bear the burden on this.”
House says the key thing is for “Congress to act expeditiously and get the legislation passed so that the market will get stabilized.”
If I own a home or plan on purchasing a home, what does this mean for me?
The stability of the mortgage market — keeping money available for people to buy homes — is closely tied to Fannie and Freddie. That’s because the companies presently fund a huge block of the nation’s mortgages, and the cornerstone of their mission is to fund mortgages for low- and moderate-income buyers.
“My sense is that all the turmoil makes homeownership more difficult,” both in terms of perceptions of homeownership and its value, says Bruce Gottschall, executive director of Neighborhood Housing Services, a Chicago-based nonprofit that assists low and moderate-income people with homeownership.
The tightening of the credit markets that has been building over the last couple of months impacts peoples’ ability to borrow money to buy homes. “From our experience, those in the low and moderate income are hit hardest and earliest in terms of that availability of credit,” he says.
– Written by Joshua Brockman, NPR, with reporting by Jim Zarroli. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Posted by admin on 18 Jun 2008 1:14 pm. Filed under Local lending.
Think again! Here are the Top 10 reasons to use a local mortgage broker over an on-line lender:
10.Local economy. Using a local lender helps keeps your money in Idaho, helping our local economy.
9.Harder working. A local lender will work harder, with more to win or lose. They live, work, and play in your “backyard,” so they know your appreciation will lead to good word-of-mouth advertising, and that your criticism could mean just the opposite.
8.Loan nuances. A local loan officer will take the time to study your individual and unique situation, then shop your particular loan to compete for the most competitive rate, vs. trying squeeze you into a one-size-fits-all box.
7.Faster closings. Being “right there when you need them” has its advantages. Communication is streamlined. Reactions are quicker. Start-to-finish, home loans and refinances are usually about 30% faster when dealing with a local lender.
6.Local flavor. Local lenders know the unique housing market, neighborhood trends, and geographically can be viewed by loan underwriters.
5.You’re not a number. Unlike on-line loan “clearance houses,” local mortgage lenders are diligent, hard-working loan officers who will take your loan personally, and as seriously as you do.
4.No phone menus. People hate phone menus! Isn’t it great to talk to a real live person who always immediately answers your calls?
3.Service level. Local lenders provide a better, higher service level. This personal attention goes a long way.
Large lending institutions turn away thousands of applicants point-blank if their income or credit score is below a certain number.
An Idaho Local Lender will take the time, for example, to explain how to fix a credit score.
What if there’s a problem during the loan process? You have more control when working with a local lender.
2.Low overhead. Local mortgage brokers don’t have the overhead that large conglomerate lending firms have. This passes the savings onto you the homebuyer/homeowner!
1.Connections. Local lenders have the expertise, knowledge, and local connections to make things happen. They’re on a first name basis with appraisers, underwriters, title company managers, real estate agents, etc..
The value of these established relationships cannot be overstated, making “Connections” our #1 reason to use a local mortgage broker over an online lender.
–
Article written by Lisa Kratz and Mike Little
Apex Mortgage in Meridian, Idaho | (208) 888-9251 | www.myidahohomeloan.com
This article about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is written by N.P.R. and A.P. Next, see our